If only one person on Earth needs to put up or shut up, then disgraced (and stripped of his 2006 Tour de France win) Floyd Landis is that person. His allegations about Lance Armstrong are obviously false and unfounded. How do I know his allegations are false and unfounded? I know because of the French. If the French could not find anything to discredit Armstrong's seven Tour de France wins, then Lance is clean. The French tried hard and are still trying overtime because Lance Armstrong is not done with the Tour de France yet. The French caught several big name cyclists doping during the Armstrong years, but none with the last name Armstrong. Are we to believe Lance Armstrong is too smart to be caught? Smarter than the French? Smarter than every athlete caught taking performance enhancing drugs (and there are a lot of cheaters being caught these days)? Or are we to believe Lance Armstrong used the same strength and determination when overcoming cancer to also overcome seven Tour de Frances? I prefer the latter.
No comments:
Post a Comment